How Engineering 91探花s Can Impact Industry in a Global World
Short description
The purpose of this project has been to critically analyze how engineering sciences impact Swedish society, by examining three industrial sectors and patterns of interactions between university and industry. Engineering sciences as developed in interaction between university and industry are one relevant type of knowledge creation and dissemination that will contribute to solving contemporary problems, while also providing intellectual capabilities for future knowledge creation. Thus, studying the specificity of Long-Term Provision of Societal Knowledge within the engineering sciences matters for society, because new technological knowledge solves new societal problems, and are crucial for stimulating later knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and business innovations.
Maureen McKelvey, Professor, has created and led this research project (cf. Principal Investigator, PI). McKelvey鈥檚 execution of this project in the research team has included both conceptual work as well as empirical studies. The research team has focused upon university-industry interactions in engineering, starting from the university, in order to discussion both the commercialization of academic research through entrepreneurship as well as academic engagement, defined as knowledge-based relationships. A mixed methods approach has been used. The qualitative research is based upon semi-structured interviews and written material to discuss perceived rationale, benefits, capabilities, and long-term development. The quantitative data includes academic patents, papers and metrics for scientific outcomes as well as technological outcomes and knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms. Her team consisted of researchers directly funded through the project, as well as a number of PhD students and post-doctoral scholars financed through other projects, but working on related topics. Our three contributions below provide evidence and insights into how the knowledge economy is changing in Sweden.
Three particularly important contributions from McKelvey鈥檚 project
1) Developed conceptualizations of how universities are changing their interactions with society, specifically in engineering. Academic engagement defined as knowledge networks requires that both the partners of university and industry respectively develop capabilities for interacting around advanced knowledge creation. In doing so, they also need organizational structures such as centers and research programs. These organizational structures help to define the rules of the game, and mitigate the divergent goals and incentives to engage in knowledge creation in industry and universities. Scientists interacting in university-industry interactions thus face what is called differing institutional logics. We propose that one way to solve these conflicts is to develop hybrid spaces, with specific types of work practices, in order to balance these minority and majority logics. Moreover, we should how specific configurations for interaction can differ for types of engineering areas, but that the joint production of knowledge for most technologies appear to benefit from medium levels of cognitive distance between partners including university, industry and public public actors.
2) Evaluated the structural conditions of policy initiatives to stimulate the performance of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial (KIE) firms through education. We examined a variety of entrepreneurship education in Sweden, in terms of differing mixes of theoretical and empirical educational practices. While we do not evaluate educational outcomes, we do find that entrepreneurial education can be constituted through a variety of configurations, which likely affect later outcomes in starting KIE firms, by affecting students鈥 ability to identify innovative opportunities and their willingness to tackle risk. Moreover, we find that in technological areas characterized by repeated collaborative engineering research, path dependence can be explained by individual-based knowledge networks with persons with PhD degrees as well as requires specialized capabilities in both universities and firms. This suggests the importance of policy initiatives to promote PhD education and mobility.
3) Examined and explained different patterns of academic engagement and university-industry interactions involving firms in high-tech, medium-tech and low-tech sectors. We find that nanotechnology tends to be driven by the commercialization of research results by academic scientists, whereas engineering for sports technology (specifically equestrian sports) tends to be driven by student projects with a wide variety of stakeholders. The field of control, signals and systems in Sweden has a broad range of deep interactions between university and industry, involving researchers as well as students, and with companies with deep technical knowledge.
Members in the project
Principal investigator
Maureen McKelvey
Co-investigators
Evangelos Bourelos
Daniel Ljungberg
Olof Zaring
Books
McKelvey, M.; Berg, K.;Brunnstr枚m, L.; Bourelos, E.; Gifford, E.; Hemberg, D.; Hermansson, I.; Lindmark, S.; Ljungberg, D.; Saemundsson, R.; Str枚m, V.; and Zaring, O. (2021). Forskningssamverkan och kommersialisering: Samh盲llets l氓ngsiktiga f枚rs枚rjning av ingenj枚rsvetenskaplig kunskap. Stockholm: Makadam f枚rlag.
Book chapters
Berg, K., McKelvey, M. (2020). 鈥滶xploring industrial PhD students and perceptions of their impact on firm innovation.鈥 In Bernhard, Gr氓sj枚, Karlsson (eds.), Diversity, innovation and clusters: Spatial perspectives.Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Storbritannien
Articles
Bourelos, E., Beyhan B., and McKelvey, M (2017). Is the Prominent Scientist also the One who Becomes an Inventor? A matching of Swedish academic pairs in nanoscience to examine the effect of publishing on patenting鈥 Research Evaluation. 26 (2), pp. 144-156. Full text DOI:
Brostr枚m, A. & M. McKelvey (2018), 鈥淓ngaging experts: 91探花-policy interactions and the introduction of congestion charging in Stockholm鈥. Minerva 56(2), 183-207 (). Open Access.
Niosi, J. and McKelvey, M. (2018). Relating business model innovations and innovation cascades: the case of biotechnology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics.28, 1081-1109. Open Access. DOI:
McKelvey, M., Saemundsson, R. Zaring, O. (2018). A recent crisis in regenerative medicine: Analyzing governance in order to identify public policy issues. 91探花 and Public Policy. 45(5), 608-620. Open Access. DOI
Zaring, O., Gifford, E, McKelvey, M. (2019). Strategic choices in the design of entrepreneurship education: An explorative study of Swedish higher education institutions. Studies in Higher Education. 46:2, 343-358, Open access Full text DOI:
Perkmann, M., McKelvey, M., Phillips, N. (2019). 鈥淧rotecting scientists from Gordon Gekko: How organizations use hybrid spaces to engage with multiple institutional logics.鈥 Organization 91探花 30, 298-318. Open Access. DOI:
McKelvey, M., Zaring, O., & Szucs, S., (2020) Conceptualizing evolutionary governance routines: governance at the interface of science and technology with knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 30:127, 591-608 (). Open Access. DOI
Hermansson, I., McKelvey, M., and Zaring, O. (2020). 鈥漁rganising an early phase of academic engagement: a case study of interactions between engineering and equestrian sports鈥. Innovation: Organization & Management. Published online 22 May 2020. Open access, Creative commons license. DOI:
Brunnstr枚m, L., Buenstorf, G., and McKelvey, M. (2020). 鈥滶xploring the Role(s) of Researcher-Based Projects in Swedish University Incubators鈥. In Academy of Management Proceedings. 2020/1, 1-6. Published online 29 July 2020. Abridged version of best papers accepted for inclusion. Open access. DOI:
Zaring, O., Sz眉cs, S. and McKelvey, M. (2021). Building Regional Innovation Capacity: linking knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship and innovation governance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 42:1/2, pp. 27-50.
Brostr枚m, A., Buenstorf, G., and McKelvey, M. (2021). 鈥漈he knowledge economy, innovation and the new challenges to universities: introduction to the special issue. Innovation: Organization and Management. Published online 6 Oct 2020. Open Access. DOI:
McKelvey, M. and Saemundsson, R. (2020). 鈥漈he grey zones of technological innovation: negative unintended consequences as a counterbalance to novelty鈥. Industry and Innovation. Published online 28 June 2020. Open access. DOI:
Websites
Gifford, E. (2017). 鈥漊tbildad personal viktigast f枚r tillv盲xten鈥. Esbri.se:
McKelvey, M. (2020). 鈥滷orskningspropositionen 2020: Satsa p氓 studenterna鈥. Esbri.se:
McKelvey, M.(2021). 鈥澝剅 det tillr盲ckligt med innovation i innovationspolitiken?鈥 Esbri panel med talare: M. McKelvey (GU); S. S枚rlin (KTH); 脜. Eriksson (Riksdagen); D. Isaksson (Vinnova); L. Hj盲lmered (Riksdagen); P. Sandvik (Rise). Available at: and
McKelvey, M. and Wennberg, K. (2021). 鈥滻nnovationsutredningen missar vad forskning s盲ger鈥 Esbri debatt. 2021-01-20. Esbri.se: